A Brief History of the Korean War – July 25, 2015

 https://www.facebook.com/BienvenidoMacario/posts/10208258060801925

 A Brief History of the Korean War

(How the U.S. Congress started the Korean War)

                                      By Bienvenido Macario  – July 27, 2015

 Dedicated to U.S. and allied soldiers who fought in the Korean War (1950-1953)

 

Aug. 1946 –At the end of WWII, North Korean communists were in Seoul. They waited for US troops to arrive before going back to the North and later joined their fellow communists to fight Chiang Kai Sek & the Kuomintangs. Chiang and his nationalists were so corrupt that 75% of all the supplies given by the US ended up in communist hands.

July 20, 1948 – Syngman Rhee was elected president of the new Republic of Korea and immediately started political repression arresting, torturing and sometimes summarily executing leftists and communists.  Remember the communists were our allies during WWII.

Protests against Rhee’s draconian rule led to the Jeju Uprising where 14,000 to 30,000 Koreans were massacred and killed, 86% of whom at the hands of Rhee’s security forces.

Rhee challenges the communists North Koreans to a showdown but the North Koreans did not respond. They were busy helping Mao Zedong & fellow Communists drive Chiang Kai Sek out of China.

March 1, 1949 – Gen. Douglas MacArthur declared the U.S. defensive perimeter as STARTING from the PHILIPPINES, up to the Ryukyu Archipelago, Okinawa, and then bends back through Japan and the Aleutian Island chain to Alaska territory (Alaska became a state on Jan. 3, 1959.)

Oct. 1, 1949 – Mao Zedong and the Communists with the help of North Koreans, defeats Chiang Kaisek & the Kuomintang. Chiang Kaisek and the nationalists ran for lives to Formosa (Taiwan). The Kuomintang was so corrupt that 75% of the military aid the U.S. gave ended up with Mao Zedong’s Red Army.

January 12, 1950 – Secretary of State Dean Acheson gave his famous Aleutians speech at the National Press Club, Washington, DC. Acheson said that United States would adhere to the principle of non-interference with respect to the Chinese question and that the American defense line in the Pacific was one that connected Alaska, the Japanese archipelago, Okinawa, and the Philippines. He said the US Pacific “defense line” or “defensive perimeter” “runs along the Aleutians to Japan and then goes back to the Ryukyus . . . We hold important positions in the Ryukyu Islands, and these we will continue to hold.” The defensive perimeter runs from the Ryukyus to the Philippine Islands,” he said. (See map on p2 )

This — Acheson tried to explain much later — was no more than what the US Joint Chiefs of Staff and Gen. Douglas McArthur held at the time, “that the U.S. line of defense starts from the Philippines and continues through the Ryukyu Archipelago, which includes its main bastion, Okinawa. Then it bends back through Japan and the Aleutian Island chain to Alaska.”

But just because he did not include South Korea as part of his “defensive perimeter,” it was said later that such omission had served to give the communists “the green light” to try to overrun Korea.

May 2, 1950 –  US Sen. TOM CONNALLY (TX – D), Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee explicitly stated in a speech that “Russia could take South Korea at her convenience & the U.S. probably would not intervene because Korea is outside the U.S.’ defense perimeter like Formosa.”

 

Encouraged by a Democrat US Senator’s comments Kim Il Sung and the North Korean troops who had just returned from the fighting in China were now thinking of accepting Rhee’s “invitation” to reunite by force i.e. go to war.

June 25, 1950 – North Korea accepts Syngman Rhee’s 1948 invitation and invaded South Korea starting the Korean War.

However back on April 25, 1950, Pres. Harry Truman approved a National Security Council policy paper known as NSC-68 allocating 20% of the US’ GNP to the military to fight communist aggression and protect non-communist countries anywhere.

Unfortunately, NSC-68 was kept secret and was never published. Had the NSC-68 been made public, Sen. Connally probably would not have made such public statement and North Korea would have had second thoughts attacking South Korea on June 25, 1950.

State Secretary Dean Acheson stated excluding Formosa and the Korean peninsula doesn’t mean the communists are welcomed to overrun Korea. But he seems to have forgotten that Pres. Roosevelt gifted “Uncle Joe” Stalin and gave USSR Eastern Europe.  Probably Asian communists needed no further encouragement.

A Brief History of the Korean War - 07-27-15 Macario Foundation p1

A Brief History of the Korean War - 07-27-15 Macario Foundation p2

A Brief History of the Korean War - 07-27-15 Macario Foundation p3

Declassified CIA Report: Summary: Possible Impact of the Granting Amnesty to Filipino collaborators 28 Mar. 1948

NOVEMBER – NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH

“Three things you cannot hide for long: the sun, the moon and the TRUTH.” – Buddha

 SUMMARY

President Roxas’ proclamation of 28 January, granting amnesty to Filipinos accused of political and economic collaboration with the Japanese has, in effect, reversed a logical course of postwar justice: those who actively aided the Japanese occupation are now not only free but may well be in a position to regain control of the government; many of those who opposed the Japanese and aided the US in recovery of the Philippines are in effect subject to persecution despite – or even as a result of – these endeavors.

Several hundred Filipino guerrillas, who opposed the occupation under their own or US leadership, are now in custody and subject to prosecution in the Philippine courts for alleged acts of violence committed during the war as part of their anti-Japanese and anti-collaborationist activities.

With the declaration of amnesty and thus the strengthening of power of the very elements against which most of these acts were perpetrated, it is obvious that Filipino testimony in behalf of accused guerillas will be difficult to obtain.

Testimony of US personnel who participated in Philippine guerilla activities would require both the consent of US citizens to appear in the Philippines AND the Philippine Government (pro-Japanese) acquiescence in their appearance.

 The ultimate effect of the amnesty, therefore, may well be detrimental to US interests in the Philippines in that: 

  • Elements suffering from its effects will believe themselves betrayed by the US and thus may reverse their previous loyalty to it; and
  • FORMER COLLABORATIONISTS who play on extreme Philippine nationalism and are themselves secretly or avowedly ANTI-US are likely to achieve political and economic control.

 

Note: The information in this report is as of 30 March 1948.

 The intelligence organizations of the Departments of State, the Army, Navy and Air Force have concurred in this report.

Summary Page - Declassified CIA Report on Implications of the Amnesty Granted to Collaborators in the Philippines - Macario Foundation1

Origins of Chinese Oligarchs In The Philippines – p.63 Karnow’s “In Our Image”

On p. 68 of Karnow’s book “In Our Image” (1989) described Rizal’s father as “an ambitious Chinese mestizo, (who) leased land from the Dominicans . . .”  It is important point out that Rizal’s family could only lease land from the Dominicans because only pure blooded Spaniards, Insulares or Penisulares, are allowed to  own land during the Spanish times.

On p. 63 (below) Karnow revealed that Lopez (ABS-CBN, Meralco, EDC Geothermal) is Chinese. He wrote:

“The fabulously wealthy Lopez family, proprietors of banks, newspapers, plantations and public utilities, is of Chinese extraction  despite the Hispanic sounding name – which was derived from “Lo”, one of the commonest names in China.”

For some reason on this page 63 as in page 223 Stanley Karnow repeated “Cory Aquino’s great-grandfather Jose Cojuangco was a penniless Chinese immigrant. . . “

Why did Chinese Lo chang his name to the Hispanic sounding name “Lopez”?

If you fast forward to p. 223, you will read the Karnow’s deliberate mistake.

Cory Aquino’s great-grandfather Jose Cojuangco was a penniless Chinese immigrant. – p.223

“Some of the biggest Filipino fortunes dated back to the sugar boom of the 19th century. During the 1860’s, for instance, Eugenio Lopez acquired (from who?) 9,000 acres of sugarcane fields on the island of Negros, and his descendants today control utilizes, newspapers and TV stations.”

How could a Chinese be allowed to buy real estate during the Spanish regime when Rizal’s father part-Spaniard or a Chinese mestizo could only lease farm lands from the Dominicans?

“In Our Image: America’s Empire in the Philippines” by Stanley Karnow

March 3, 1990 | ISBN-10: 0345328167 | ISBN-13: 978-0345328168

http://www.amazon.com/In-Our-Image-Americas-Philippines/dp/0345328167

Chinese origins of Filipino oligarchs Lopez, Cojuangco, etc. p.62 & 63 from Karnow' 'In Our Image